A $175B Refund?
What has President Trump said this week?
〰️
What has President Trump said this week? 〰️
1. U.S. Trade Deficit Despite Tariffs
In 2025, the U.S. merchandise (goods) trade deficit reached a record $1.2 trillion, despite some of the steepest tariffs imposed in decades under President Trump (The Washington Post, 2026). A trade deficit occurs when the value of imports exceeds exports over time. While goods trade widened, the U.S. recorded a $901.5 billion services surplus, slightly smaller than the previous year. Tariffs appear to have shifted supply chains rather than reduced the deficit: imports from China declined sharply as companies redirected sourcing toward other Asian exporters to reduce tariff exposure. Broader domestic factors, particularly strong consumer demand and the U.S. budget deficit, continue to sustain high import volumes even when tariffs raise costs (The Washington Post, 2026).
Legal uncertainty has now intensified after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that Trump exceeded his authority by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a sanctions law, to impose tariffs on imports (Reuters, 2026). The Court sent the case back to the Court of International Trade, potentially triggering refund claims from companies that paid the duties. Estimates from the Penn Wharton Budget Model suggest roughly $175–$179 billion in tariff revenue collected under IEEPA since February 2025, about $500 million per day, could be subject to refunds, which would likely be paid from the U.S. Treasury (Reuters, 2026).
Despite the ruling, the administration has moved quickly to maintain tariff pressure, announcing a temporary 10% global import duty for 150 days while launching new trade investigations under other legal authorities. Treasury officials say these measures could keep tariff revenues “virtually unchanged” in 2026, noting customs receipts have already surged, reaching about $27.7 billion in January alone (Reuters, 2026). In the near term, the combination of persistent trade deficits, shifting supply chains, and legal uncertainty around tariffs is likely to keep tariff exposure and potential refund risk, top of mind for import-heavy sectors.
2. U.S. Government Orders Phase-Out of Anthropic AI Systems
President Trump ordered federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s AI systems and begin phasing them out after the Department of Defense classified the company as a “supply chain risk”, following a dispute over how the military could use its AI models (CBS News, 2026; NPR, 2026). A “supply chain risk”designation generally refers to concerns that a vendor’s technology could introduce vulnerabilities, such as backdoors or exploitable dependencies, into critical government systems, potentially enabling espionage or sabotage (Just Security, 2026).
The dispute reportedly escalated after the U.S. government requested that Anthropic remove safeguards limiting how its Claude model could be used by the military. Anthropic had pushed for clearer guardrails preventing certain applications, including mass surveillance of Americans or fully autonomous weapons, while Pentagon officials argued they required broad lawful-use authority for defense operations (CBS News, 2026; Axios, 2026). The conflict comes amid a broader debate over the role of AI in military and national security settings (BBC, 2026; CNN, 2026).
Anthropic rejected the supply chain risk designation, describing its stance as values-based limits on certain military uses, while emphasizing that the company supports U.S. national interests (Anthropic, 2026; CBS News, 2026). Despite the announced ban, reports indicate that the U.S. military continued using Claude during the Iran conflict over the weekend, though officials did not disclose how the system was deployed (CBS News, 2026). In parallel, OpenAI announced a partnership with the Department of War, stating its models will not be used for surveillance of U.S. persons, directing autonomous weapons, or high-stakes automated decision-making (OpenAI, 2026). Together, these developments highlight a rapidly evolving defense AI landscape in which procurement decisions, security designations, and vendor policy disagreements can quickly reshape the competitive environment for AI providers (NPR, 2026; CNN, 2026).
3. Energy Markets React to Strait of Hormuz Tensions
Tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical shipping routes for oil and gas, have pushed energy markets higher in recent days. Iran has largely halted oil and gas exports through the strait following attacks linked to the United States and Israel, raising concerns about potential supply disruptions (The Guardian, 2026). Even short disruptions can move prices quickly, as buyers and shipping companies often reposition cargoes, increase freight bids, and purchase additional insurance when key routes become unsafe (Axios, 2026).
Oil and gas prices have already reacted sharply as markets attempt to price in the potential duration of the disruption. Crude oil traded around $83 per barrel on Tuesday afternoon, about 10% higher than its level the previous Friday, reflecting risk tied to the conflict (Axios, 2026). U.K. natural gas prices have also risen as traders assess broader supply risks (The Guardian, 2026). If sustained, higher oil prices typically feed through to gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, shipping costs, plastics, chemicals, and many transport-intensive consumer goods.
President Trump stated that the U.S. would help manage rising insurance and safety risks by escorting tankers through the Strait and protecting shipping routes, saying the United States “will ensure the FREE FLOW of ENERGY to the WORLD” (Truth Social, 2026). The statement helped ease oil prices somewhat, though they remain elevated relative to pre-conflict levels (Axios, 2026). The situation is also creating political pressure in Washington as Congress debates war powers and the Iran conflict becomes more prominent ahead of the midterm elections (Al Jazeera, 2026).