Monetary Relief, Legal Uncertainty
What has President Trump said this week?
〰️
What has President Trump said this week? 〰️
1. The Latest Fed Cut
The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points at its December 10 meeting, extending its shift toward monetary easing after nearly two years of restrictive policy. Officials cited slowing job growth, cooling inflation, and weakening business investment as key reasons for the move, while cautioning that “pockets of stagflation” could emerge if economic activity decelerates too quickly (Washington Post, 2025). The decision continues the trend seen throughout the second half of 2025, as the Fed has gradually responded to softer demand and ongoing external pressures.
Markets welcomed the cut, viewing it as a sign that policymakers remain committed to engineering a soft landing. But analysts emphasize that the easing also reflects rising concern about tighter financial conditions, elevated tariffs, and persistent uncertainty weighing on both consumers and firms (Reuters, 2025). With credit markets strained and household finances under increasing pressure, the impact of lower rates may unfold gradually.
For borrowers and lenders, the implications are meaningful: reduced rates should ease costs for mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards, and may spur refinancing activity (Business Insider, 2025). For investors, the December cut strengthens expectations of additional easing in early 2026, though the precise path will hinge on the pace of disinflation and whether growth stabilizes. The Fed’s challenge, supporting the economy without reigniting inflation, will remain a central focus for markets heading into the new year.
2. Supreme Court Takes the Case on Tariffs
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a landmark case challenging the legality of tariffs imposed by President Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The lawsuit arises amid growing concern from business groups and legal scholars that the administration exceeded its authority by using IEEPA, a statute designed for national security emergencies, to levy broad tariffs on U.S. trading partners (Brennan Center, 2025). The outcome could redefine the extent to which presidents may rely on emergency powers to shape global trade policy.
Under IEEPA, presidents can regulate international commerce during declared national emergencies. Critics argue that the administration stretched the law’s intent by applying it to long-running trade disputes rather than acute threats, such as the fentanyl crisis. Supporters counter that national security today includes economic vulnerabilities, including supply chain fragility and strategic-industry exposure, and therefore warrants broad presidential discretion (The Hill, 2025). The Court’s decision to hear the case highlights growing friction among the executive branch, Congress, and the judiciary over the modern boundaries of economic and trade authority.
A ruling against President Trump’s tariffs could curb presidential power under IEEPA, though it may not significantly affect policy outcomes, as the administration could pursue similar measures under traditional trade statutes or seek new congressional authority (Reuters, 2025). A ruling that upholds expansive IEEPA powers, however, would set a far-reaching precedent, enabling future presidents to impose tariffs unilaterally and more forcefully. For investors, the case adds uncertainty around tariff durability, supply-chain strategy, and geopolitical risk heading into 2026.
3. Pennsylvania Rally: Jobs, Prices and Wages
On December 9, President Trump held a rally at a casino in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, emphasizing his administration’s efforts to address the cost of living and promote investment (Reuters, 2025; The White House, 2025; The Guardian, 2025). He highlighted declines in gasoline prices, which reached around $1.99 per gallon in some states, and cited $100 billion in investment commitments for Pennsylvania. Trump also claimed that nearly 60,000 new jobs had been created in the state, including 4,000 manufacturing positions, and that more than 40,000 residents had been lifted off food assistance programs. Standing beneath signs reading “Lower Prices, Bigger Paychecks,” he described affordability as a priority while framing ongoing price pressures as the result of the previous administration.
Government data, however, presents a more mixed picture. Job growth has slowed, unemployment has reached a four-year high, and the Consumer Price Index rose 3% in the 12 months through September (Axios, 2025). While economic growth has rebounded after an early-year contraction, many households still face rising costs for groceries, utilities, and health care. Real wage gains cited by Trump, $1,300 for factory workers, $1,800 for construction workers, and $3,300 for miners, reflect selective improvements, while overall income growth has been modest after adjusting for inflation.
Trump’s remarks also included broader political and social topics, including immigration, tariffs, and his defense of a $12 billion bailout for farmers affected by trade disputes with China (The Guardian, 2025). When asked in a Politico interview what grade he would give the economy, he responded “A-plus-plus-plus-plus-plus.” Public polling indicates ongoing concern about affordability: a CBS News/YouGov survey found 65% of respondents say Trump’s policies are raising food and grocery costs, while only 33–36% approve of his handling of the economy. The rally points to areas of economic progress while indicating that the broader influence of current policies may not be immediate.